Israel Thrives: Australia's Answer To Pat Condell

Friday, February 22, 2013

Australia's Answer To Pat Condell

geoffff

All is not lost while we still have young people in our country like this one.

Do listen to what he has to say while you can.

I have a horrible feeling YouTube will silence him soon enough.

And congratulations to Pat Condell for the inspiration to us all.

cross posted Geoffff's Joint

3 comments:

Mike L.February 22, 2013 at 4:14 PM
I have to say, Geoffff, Wilders is one of those people that I tend to go back and forth on.

I am a critic of political Islam. Just as liberals in the west tend to oppose making Christianity the basis of law, so I oppose making Islam the basis of law.

The reason that as an American I free to speak out against political Islam is because Sharia institutionalizes Jews, and non-Muslims, as something akin to slaves, which is what dimmitude is.

The difference between Wilders and myself, if I understand him correctly, is that he opposes Islam in itself because of his concern about Islamic immigration and "stealth Jihad."

Is that correct?

I feel reasonably certain that this distinction, the distinction between Islam and what I call "political Islam" may be the basis for conversation going forward.
ReplyDelete
geoffffFebruary 22, 2013 at 5:11 PM
I make the same distinction Mike.

Wilders makes a distinction between "Islam" which he says is an ideology and "Muslims" who accepts can be and usually are good and moderate people but he says that all immigration from Islamic countries should be stopped including by non-Muslims.

By that he hopes to deflect the discrimination tag. It's the ideology he hates, not the people.

I would not go that far but I would certainly impose a "no-hate, no -violence" test on all immigrants and asylum seekers on a one by one basis.

"Do you believe that there is an immutable and higher law that should be spread across the world if necessary by force?"

"Do you believe that there is a small minority of people who are intrinsically evil and who alone may be descended from animals and who are seeking to control the world?"

"Do you think that the word of a man is worth that of two women?"

and so on

Answer yes to one question and you are out. Fuck off. No question.

ReplyDelete
geoffffFebruary 22, 2013 at 7:24 PM
Thanks Mike

Please let me know how you did that after Shabbos
ReplyDelete

Add comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

What You Can't Discuss:

This is a partial list of taboo topics within progressive-left venues around the Arab-Israel conflict. You cannot discuss this material because it undermines the "Palestinian narrative" of perpetual victimhood. This narrative is a club used by the Arab and Muslim enemies of Israel, along with their western progressive allies, to delegitimize that country in preparation for its eventual dissolution.

1) The centuries of Jewish dhimmitude under the boot of Islamic imperialism.

2) The recent construction of Palestinian identity, its connection to Soviet Cold War politics, and how this is an Arab people with a Roman name that refers to Greeks.

3) Arab and Palestinian Koranically-based racism as the fundamental source of the conflict.

4) The ways in which contemporary progressive anti-Zionism serves as a cloak for gross anti-Semitism.

5) The Palestinian theft and appropriation of Jewish history.

6) "Pallywood."

7) The historical connections between the Nazis, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Palestinian national movement.

8) The perpetual refusal of the Palestinian-Arabs to accept a state for themselves in peace next to the Jewish one.

9) The progressive portrayal of terrorists as those fighting a righteous war of "resistance."

10) The Arab-Palestinian indoctrination of children with Jew hatred.

11) Human rights violations against women, children, and Gay people in the Muslim Middle East.

12) The fact that violent Jihadis call themselves "Jihadis" and claim to love death above life.

This is only a partial list, so please let us know the many more that we are missing.

Barack Obama on the so-called "Arab Spring" (May 19, 2011):

"There are times in the course of history when the actions of ordinary citizens spark movements for change because they speak to a longing for freedom that has been building up for years. In America, think of the defiance of those patriots in Boston who refused to pay taxes to a King, or the dignity of Rosa Parks as she sat courageously in her seat."

The "Arab Spring" is the rise of radical Islam in the Middle East and this is what Obama compares the Civil Rights Movement to? How's that for a kick in the head to Martin Luther King, Jr.?

The Fundamental Argument:

The progressive movement, and the activist base of the Democratic Party, creates and supports venues that demonize and defame the Jewish state, thereby also creating hatred toward the Jewish people.

Such venues include political journals, such as, but not limited to, Daily Kos, the Huffington Post, and the UK Guardian, numerous universities throughout the United States and Europe, various NGOs with an anti-Israel agenda, and the entire progressive-left movement to boycott, divest from, and sanction (BDS) the Jewish people of the state of Israel.

These venues and organizations do not generally criticize Israel, but dehumanize that country.

For this reason, among others, the progressive movement, and the activist base of the Democratic Party, undermines the well-being and safety of Jews around the world, sometimes resulting in violence toward us.

Therefore, as a matter of common sense and basic human decency, Jews should leave the progressive movement and the Democratic Party as we seek to build alternative political structures that are not home to toxic anti-Semitic anti-Zionists, who would see us robbed of self-determination and self-defense.

Pages

Friday, February 22, 2013

Australia's Answer To Pat Condell

3 comments: