Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Racist Kossacks Blame AIPAC, Always (Updated)



The vile racists over at Daily Kos are blaming the Jews for Obama's political blunder with the Republicans.

This is just so typical of Nazis. Barack Obama said nothing wrong when he suggested that Israel's final borders should be based on the '67 lines. Of course, they should be based on the '67 lines. They need not, and should not, conform directly to those lines, but there should be land swaps and the major settlements near the so-called "green line" should be incorporated into Israel.

The status of Jerusalem needs to be negotiated, but I personally favor maintaining the city's unity.

In any case, the speeches recently given by Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu reveal that the two gentlemen are mainly on the same page. The only people screeching at them are those who wish to keep the conflict alive and/or those who wish to make political hay out of the matter. On the Right there are those who suggest that Obama wants Israel to go directly back to the "Auschwitz Lines" of 1967, which is not what Obama has suggested.

These are Republicans, like Orrin Hatch, trying to make some political hay.

However, on the Left there are Nazis who want to see the conflict deepen and who blame the Jews for the Republican response to Obama.

On Daily Kos, Geekesque has a "diary" blaming AIPAC. Of course, they blame AIPAC.  They always blame AIPAC.  Progressive-left Nazis despise pretty much all Jewish groups with the exception of anti-Zionist Jewish organizations, such as Jewish Voice for Peace, and cannot fathom that American politicians support Israel not because of AIPAC arm-twisting, but because their constituency is largely supportive of Israel and simply do not share progressive anti-Zionist hatred of all things Jewish.

In Senate Democrats Eager to Pass "Permanent Occupation" Resolution, Geekesque tells us the following:

The Hill has the depressing story.

Senate Democrats are expected to support a resolution intended as a rebuff to President Obama’s call for basing Middle East peace talks on the 1967 Israeli-Palestinian borders.

It would be a rare rebuke of the president by the upper chamber and a sign that Democrats are worried about the impact of last week’s speech on the U.S.-Israel relationship and pro-Israel constituents.

Translation: AIPAC & Co are not pleased.

Thanks for the translation Mister Nazi Guy.

Just because Orrin Hatch is trying to make some political hay out of Obama's speech, and just because many Democrats do, in fact, support Israel, this does not mean that the evil and insidious AIPAC is slithering behind things.

He doesn't even bother to provide even a smidgen of evidence. He just knows, somehow, that the evil Jews are behind this... whatever this is, exactly.

It's such a classic racist canard, the idea that American politicians only support Israel because of AIPAC... the Evil and Horrendous AIPAC... behind the scenes, pulling the strings, controlling American foreign policy and media, an octopus with many arms and stabbing the American public in the back with more than one.

This is why the Nazis slaughtered the Jews, because they just knew that we were manipulating things to the detriment of the "good people."

This is what Geekesque is telling the world.

UPDATE:

In the comments Geekesque says the following:

It was a mistake. (4+ / 0-)

Obama thinks it's his responsibility to show leadership and broker a peace deal.

Honestly, he should just get out of the way. Israel's long-term fate is really none of our concern.

"[R]ather high-minded, if not a bit self-referential"--The Washington Post.

by Geekesque on Wed May 25, 2011 at 07:44:43 AM PDT

Exactly!

The fate of the Jewish people is not your concern.

This is all that I have been saying. The progressive-left, as a group, is not the least little bit concerned about the fate of the Jewish people. If and when the time comes, again, we cannot count on them.

They tell us so, directly.

We need to believe them when they tell us that they do not care.

They do not care about Gays in the Middle East. They do not care about women in the Middle East. And they most certainly do not care about Jews in the Middle East.

We need to understand that.

We need to understand that, as a movement, the progressive-left has entirely given up on the notion of universal human rights. Instead they are highly selective about just whose "human rights" they wish to champion and while they may champion Palestinian human rights, they certainly do not care about our human rights.

When they see us dead, they'll blame us for it, just as they blamed the Fogels for the Radical Jihadi violence that saw the near beheading of a 3 month old baby girl.

Mark my words.

Second Update:

Geekesque in same diary:

Negotiations will not produce a Palestinian (0+ / 0-)
state.

Only the entire rest of the planet shoving it down Israel's throat will.

"[R]ather high-minded, if not a bit self-referential"--The Washington Post.

by Geekesque on Wed May 25, 2011 at 11:27:50 AM PDT

Notice the intense Nazi-like hostility.

Furthermore, of course, he totally ignores the fact that the Palestinians have refused every single offer for statehood and won't even negotiate the question with Israel.

Yet, against all rationality and human decency, many, many people on the progressive-left, like Geekesque, think that it's Israel's fault that the Palestinians do not have a state.

The progressive-left has clearly become the ideological home of contemporary Nazism and in the Long Arab War Against the Jews, they have chosen to side against us.

At least during the Holocaust the Left was indifferent. Now they are, many of them, actually on the other side.

6 comments:

  1. You use the word "vile" very frequently. Perhaps vary it a bit with words like "loathsome" or "monstrous".

    ReplyDelete
  2. LOL!

    I'm sure that you're right!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Indeed, you know, variation is the spice of life. Vile has so many beautiful synonyms:

    abject, appalling, coarse, degenerate, depraved, foul, horrid, nefarious, noxious, and on and on.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You remind me of Mrs. Mauer, my 10th grade English teacher.

    However, much like her, you are quite correct.

    Cheers!

    ReplyDelete
  5. There sure seems to be an almost maniacal surge of anti-Israel diaries at dKos lately. Either they smell blood or are scared. Personally I think it's that they fantacise the first when they should beware they second. REAL DEMs with actual power are standing behind Israel you dKos dummies!@ That makes you all outliers......VILE outliers!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well, Doodad,

    I think that they use anything that they can that is out there in the media to abuse the Jewish state.

    What they've got now is this faux dispute between Obama and Netanyahu.

    Conservatives and Republicans are using this thing, whatever it is exactly, to clobber Obama... make him out as weak and unfriendly ally to Israel... which, of course, is true.

    The anti-Zionists are always, and forever, on the look-out for anything that they can slam Israel with, so now they have this alleged Netanyahu affront to Obama.

    Y'know, I despise politics.

    Were it not for this never-ending hostilities toward the Jewish people, I would be blogging about either baseball or cooking.

    ReplyDelete