Tuesday, November 1, 2016

This week on NOTHING LEFT (Nov 1, 2016)

Michael Lumish

Michael Burd and Alan Freedman (hosts) tell us:
This week we speak with cartoonist Bill Leak from The Australian who is embroiled in a stoush over Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act; we hear from British-Irish journalist Ruth Dudley Edwards on the comparison between Palestinian terrorism with that of the IRA; and we catch up with Efraim Inbar from the Begin-Sadat Centre who is currently in Australia. We also speak with Michael Danby MP on UNESCO as well as the Hadassah Hospital Oration and its invitation to Tim Costello, and we hear from Isi Leibler as usual from Jerusalem.
Nothing_Left 3 min Editorial: Section 18C

12 min Bill Leak, cartoonist with The Australian

28 min Ruth Dudley Edwards, British-Irish journalist on terrorism

50 min Efraim Inbar, Begin-Sadat Centre

1 hr 2 min Michael Danby MP, on Hadassah and UNESCO

1 hr 40 min Isi Leibler, on UNESCO

Monday, October 31, 2016

The end of an occupation

Sar Shalom

In just over a week, we'll be celebrating the anniversary of the end of the Soviet occupation of West Berlin. What's that, you don't remember the Soviets having ever occupied West Berlin? Well, don't you remember the Berlin Airlift during which the Soviets prohibited all ground deliveries to West Berlin? What? You don't consider that an occupation and even if it was an occupation, it ended in less than a year and for over 40 years it was possible for supplies to get to West Berlin over land. Fine, does Checkpoint Charlie ring a bell? From the time the Berlin Wall was built until the fall of East Germany, anybody entering of leaving West Berlin had to pass through a phalanx of zigzag barriers and military inspections on the eastern side. What's that? You say that the Soviets still did not have any forces actually present in West Berlin?

Well there you have the real definition of occupation. It consists of forces of the occupying power being garrisoned in the occupied territory and the legitimate government of the territory being unable to function. Yet somehow, this requirement for occupation does not stop much of the world from decrying Israel's occupation of Ramallah and Jenin. Just as Palestinians have to pass through checkpoints when they pass from Area A/B to Area C, Germans had to pass through checkpoints to move between East and West Berlin. Just as the West German government was able to carry the full scope of its operations in West Berlin and no Soviet troops were garrisoned there, the PA is able to carry the full scope of its operations in Area A and there are no IDF troops garrisoned in Area A.

The major argument for the notion that Israel is not occupying the "West Bank" is that there is no legal basis on which to say that the territory belongs to anyone besides Israel. However, there is another why the Palestinian people are not under occupation. Over 90% of the Arab population of the "West Bank" lives in territory governed by the PA. Unless one is willing to say that West Berlin was under Soviet occupation prior to the fall of the Berlin Wall, that means that over 90% of the Arabs of the "West Bank" are not living under occupation.

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Israel and Contemporary Forms of Western-Left Racism

Michael Lumish

{Also published at the Elder of Ziyon and Jews Down Under.}

fist
A Symbol of the Pro-Palestinian Movement
As the progressive-left and Democratic Party fling around charges of racism like confetti, perhaps it is time to remind people of the forms of western-left racism.

Why, after all, should Republicans and independents get all the fun?

There are charges of racism to be flung with wild abandon on all sides!

The racism embedded in the progressive movement, and thus embedded in the Democratic Party, takes three interrelated forms.

These are humanitarian racism, anti-white racism, and anti-Semitic anti-Zionism.


Humanitarian Racism

The most prominent form of western-left racism is what scholar Manfred Gerstenfeld dubbed "humanitarian racism." 

Humanitarian racism is the primary form of racism practiced in the West, today, but it is a socially acceptable form of racism. It is a type of racism that currently flies under the radar of most Americans even as a form of racism. Humanitarian racists regard all minority groups, and all individuals within those minority groups, as perpetual victims of white racist imperialism, including minority students at elite American universities.

Western-left humanitaran racism acts as a sort-of umbrella racism that shields and nurtures hostility toward white people, malice toward the Jewish state of Israel, and demeaning condescension toward all peoples of non-European backgrounds.

As an underlying theme within the western progressive-left, humanitarian racism can be defined as a prominent form of discrimination typified by the tendency to see minority groups as mere pawns on a world stage dominated by malicious white people intent upon imperial dominance.

Wherever the humanitarian racist casts his eye he sees aggressive western imperialists intent on stealing the resources of non-white peoples in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. He sees aggressive western corporate marauders endeavoring to impose their vapid and inauthentic Playstation Culture on the peaceable indigenous peoples of the world. He sees People of Whiteness absconding with the cultural creations of indigenous cultures. 

And, of course, he sees the United States reeking havoc throughout the world in order to yank another filthy dollar out of other people's lands and labor.

Among the things that the humanitarian racist refuses to see, however - aside from the idea that white people are not evil - is the fact that non-white people have dignity, history, and agency. While those of us who are concerned about the rise of Political Islam respect that movement as an aggressive power in the world, humanitarian racists pity Jihadis as Victims of the White Man who can be sympathized with when they endeavor to kill non-Muslims. 

The Muslim worlds, in particular, represent ancient peoples with long histories of struggle and dominance that created highly influential works of science, art, architecture, religious innovation, and various other forms of cultural production. Islam, after all, is the most successful example of aggressive imperialism in world history. Of the great national powers, only Islamic imperialism to this day maintains far-flung colonies thousands of miles from the imperial bases of Mecca (for the Sunnis) and Tehran (for the Shia).

When humanitarian racists look at Muslim societies outside of the West they see little children in need of protection in a way suggestive of nineteenth-century European notions of "white man's burden." When non-racists, of any type, look at Muslim societies, outside of the West, they see the inheritors of a once great theocratically-based empire that fell into decline when faced with superior western technology, but now resurgent as the West loses confidence in itself.

Whatever the influence of white westerners in the world - good, bad, or otherwise - the humanitarian racist refuses to recognize that non-whites are not merely victims. This is due to the essential narcissism of the movement which insists that ultimately everything is about white people.

Here's a newsflash.

It isn't.

Anti-White Racism

It is not unfair to say that following the Vietnam War, within academia, post-structuralist theorists undermined the knowability of truth, while post-colonial theorists reduced the world to indigenous victims "of color" and their white, imperial victimizers.

It is for this reason that the well-meaning students at the University of Wisconsin sell "All White People are Racists" hoodies, which is an act that ultimately encourages violence by thugs upon ordinary Anglo-type nobodies walking home from work.

It is also for this reason that so many anti-white humanitarian racists believe that there is something inherently malicious within white Wonder Bread culture, particularly in the United States. It is not merely that the petite bourgeoisie support western imperialism through their very act of being - that and paying taxes - but that there is something deplorable and irredeemably awful in White Ways of Being.

The concept is entirely nonsensical, of course, yet it is fascinating.

Many anti-white bigots think that Whiteness is not merely about skin-color, but about ways of being (ontologies) and ways of knowing (epestimologies).  In this way Whiteness is essentialized into a form of evil that is directly embedded not only into white-European cultures, but into every aspect of white lives. White people are "white" not merely for coming out of the Euro-family of peoples, but as a matter of consciousness characterized by vapid inauthenticity, rapacious greed, and heartless militarism.

Like Ahab's Great White Whale, "whiteness" symbolizes a form of evil in the world and, therefore, irrepentant white people, much like Jewish-Israelis and their "Zionist" supporters, are fabricated as an enemy of "indigenous" people, everywhere.


Anti-Semitic Anti-Zionism

Humanitarian racism should be of particular interest to those of us concerned about the rise of anti-Semitic anti-Zionism and the well-being of the Jewish State of Israel.

Jewish-Israelis are surrounded by a hostile population in the Middle East that outnumbers them by a factor of 60 to 70 to 1. Many of those neighbors advocate for the destruction of those Jews given any real opportunity. The Long Arab War against the Jews of the Middle East is grounded in an irrational, Koranically-based rancor, but sold to the West as a matter of "social justice."

Following World War II, Nazi-flavored anti-Semitism met with (and married) traditional theocratically-based anti-Jewish Muslim bigotry which then heavily influenced the Palestinian Narrative. Within that narrative, the returning Jewish remnants, including Holocaust survivors, are portrayed as violent colonialist intruders intent on the ethnic-cleansing and exploitation of the Palestinian-Arabs. 

This, in a nutshell, is the so-called "Palestinian narrative" and western humanitarian racists gobble it up like cherry pie.

Jewish-Israelis, who want nothing so much as to be left the hell alone to create their medical and technological doo-dads and live their lives without friends and family blown to smithereens by Jihadis, are depicted as the very worst people on the planet.

The Muslim peoples of the Middle East have persecuted the dhimmi minorities in that part of the world since Muhammad started receiving astral visitations from the Archangel Gabriel in the seventh-century.

And every generation Jews are told by both Arabs and Europeans just why it is that we deserve a good beating.

This generation is no different.

Friday, October 28, 2016


Moment of Truth?

Michael Lumish



Without plunging head-first into the muck which is this presidential campaign - or is that inescapable? - I want to make note of this Pat Condell video wherein he compares Hillary and Trump.

It is highly likely that we are looking at four to eight years of Hillary Clinton and Condell's analysis of the consequnces are worthy of consideration.

He stresses that Hillary will continue Obama's push toward a European-style social democracy as developed in recent years by the EU. Condell, however, considers the EU to be a non-democratic disaster and warns Americans away from making the same mistake.

Condell, in fact, is so disenchanted with the EU that he sees it - not unreasonably - as a step toward a world without borders. This world without borders, he suggests, will be controlled by a centralized global corporate government.

He stresses the significance of the upcoming election by suggesting that it is really a choice between American-style secular democracy versus European-style social-democracy. He characterizes the latter as obsessed "with open borders, mass migration, and a remote unaccountable government dominated by large corporations."

{Think James Caan in Rollerball... except with Jihadis.}

Condell suggests that Brexit was an expression of the will of the British people to not live under the domination of a foreign capital, Brussels, that is beholden to the corporate world. He is also displeased that the EU has forced the immigration of millions of non-democratically-inclined people into Europe, great numbers of whom refuse to integrate, as they set up their own systems of jurisprudence within sovereign nations.

Condell's piece caught the eye of Israeli columnist Martin Sherman who differed in his analysis.

Sherman does not believe that it is America versus Europe so much as a contest between "traditional Western values" with "Judeo-Christian foundations" versus... something else.

He described this something else, in a 2012 article, as displaying “the same strains of resentment and envy, suspicion of others’ achievement, the belief that the success of some was necessarily the product of exploitation pervades much of the anti-colonial, anti-American – and yes, anti-Zionist – philosophy of many members of the Non-Aligned Movement.”

I prefer Condell's view on the matter and see it as a contest between a more traditional American political culture that stresses individuality and freedom versus a European political culture that is concentrating power in the European Union.

What's important in Sherman's argument, to my mind, is this:
As Obama’s perceived successor, Clinton will be bound to preserve and promote—whether of her own volition or not—these political perspectives, simply because of the political milieu in which she will be compelled to operate, the political interests she will be compelled to serve and the political allegiances she will be compelled to maintain.
Every four years we are told that this is the election of a life-time.

Every four years the US newsmedia stresses over and over and over how crucial to all of humanity the upcoming election is.

And every four years I dismiss this notion as nonsense.

This year I am less certain.

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

It's Time For The World To Ostrasize Palestine

Doodad

Any decent society would dislike and ultimately ostracize any overtly violent hateful murderous country so why not the ultimate candidate: Palestine? Daily, this disgraceful culture displays its hate and murderous violence sanctioned by its political elite. I could list hundreds of examples but here is the latest atrocity.

From Palestinian Media Watch:


PA official on importance of school's name: 
"To commemorate the memory of this great national fighter" 
- School in West Bank named after Salah Khalaf, head of Black September terror group. 
- Attacks he planned include murder of 11 Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics and murder of 2 American diplomats in Sudan. 
- PA Ministry of Education is responsible for naming schools. 
- This is the 4th PA school named after terrorist Salah Khalaf. 
- PMW has written to the European Union which funds the Palestinian Authority Ministry of Education to condition its funding on the PA changing the names of all schools named after terrorists 
The Palestinian Authority has again chosen to name a school after a terrorist. Soon children in the West Bank city of Tulkarem will be reminded daily that murdering Israelis is heroic when they attend "the Martyr Salah Khalaf School," which is named after the head of the Black September terror organization, Salah Khalaf, also known as Abu Iyad. Attacks he planned include the murder of the 11 Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics (Sept. 5, 1972) and the murder of 2 American diplomats in Sudan (March 1, 1973). 
The Palestinian Authority laid the cornerstone to the new school a few weeks ago, and at the ceremony PA official Issam Abu Bakr, District Governor of Tulkarem, "emphasized the importance of the project of building the school named after Martyr Salah Khalaf, in order to commemorate the memory of this great national fighter." [Official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, Sept. 24, 2016]
Need I say more? They do this crap all the freaking time and the international community doesn't even bat an eye. Shame on them. Can you imagine though if Israel named a school after Baruch Kopel Goldstein? Of course it would never happen because Israel is a civilized, sane society, unlike others in that hood.