Thursday, June 19, 2025

We are on the verge

 


of God Knows What.

The big question at this moment is Trump.

Will he, or won't he, authorize the US to take out the Fordo nuclear facility in Iran?

My suspicion is that he will and my hope is that this represents the entirety of American involvement in the military aspect of whatever goes down.

My hope is that the Persians take this as an opportunity to remove the Jihadis from power and I honestly do not care if they bring in Reza Pahlavi (the "Crown Prince") to head up the government or not.

That being said, those of us who favor Western Liberalism over Jihadism must support the Pahlavi movement in Iran for the purpose of removing the ayatollahs. Whoever among them heads that government, whether it be Pahlavi or somebody else, is entirely up to them.

At the end of the day, I care about two things when it comes to Iran.

1) They must not be allowed to gain nuclear weaponry.

2) The government going forward cannot be Jihadi because that will mean ongoing war against the Jews in the Middle East.

--

The Iranian movement to replace the Jihadi regime with Reza Pahlavi is going unnoticed in the US media.

I was just watching the "2-Way" morning show with Mark Halperin, Sean Spicer, and Dan Turrentine and in their discussion of Iran they do not even reference the fact that a majority of Iranians want the ayatollahs to go away.

--

Today is Juneteenth!

This a new American holiday that makes beautiful sense.

I am sick to death of "woke" neo-socialism, but a holiday celebrating the end of slavery is entirely appropriate.


Peace to you, please.

--

Times of Israel - "White House: Trump will decide whether to join war on Iran ‘within next two weeks’"

Hmmm...

I don't know what to make of this.

It seems as if Trump is torn between two major priorities. One is to avoid war and the other is to eliminate the possibility of Jihadi nukes.

I very much hope that he can do both.


Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Will the US occupy Iran?


Landon Hill
@ImaBigCat

I’m disappointed in Tucker, but population is relevant in that if we are going to try and occupy Iran, keep the peace between factions, support the new government…92M people is a lot of people.

MichaelLumish
@MichaelLumish

My suspicion is that the US will not occupy Iran, but we shall see!

--

The best possible hope, I suppose, is that the Jihadi regime will fall and be organically replaced by secular democrats (or a constitutional monarchy?) who will want good relations with the US and Israel.

We can hope.

One thing that has consistently bothered me about coverage of the never-ending conflict is that there seems to be little recognition by the media that the ayatollahs are part of a larger international movement coming out of the Middle East that we call Jihadism.

Jihadism is a violent, authoritarian, Jew Hating theocratic political movement that seeks the annihilation of Israel and conflict with the West.

Some would say that this is not "Jihadism" or "radical Islam" or "political Islam," but just Islam, in general.

That may be the case, but it's important to make a distinction between the political movement and your regular Muslim neighbor down the street.

I live in one of the most ethnically-diverse places in the world and there is no reason for me to think poorly of my Muslim neighbors.

The problem is not Muslims, particularly those born and bred in the United States. The problem is the international political movement coming out of the Middle East and typified not only by relatively small regional groups like Hamas or Islamic Jihad or Boko Haram, but by state governments like those in Iran and, increasingly, Turkey.

--

Patti Mohr
@MohrMedia1

I guarantee you, they sure as hell don't want a government subservient to your government or mine. 

Regime change is a disatrous policy that creates instability all around the world.

MichaelLumish
@MichaelLumish

That's a very good point and the concerns of isolationist Republicans are not unfounded.

My hope is that in an organic fashion the Persians overthrow the Jihadis and normalize relations with Israel.

--

Question to Grok3:

In a recent John Stewart bit he mocked Netanyahu for complaining many times since at least 2012 that Iran was on the verge of nuclear weapons and it never happened. Ben Shapiro countered that the reason Iran did not cross the nuclear threshold is because Israel prevented it from doing so. In what ways has Israel, not including the present moment, countered Iranian nuclear efforts?

Grok3:

As of 07:30 AM PDT on Wednesday, June 18, 2025, Israel has undertaken several notable actions to counter Iran’s nuclear program prior to the current moment, aligning with Ben Shapiro’s argument that these efforts have delayed Iran’s nuclear threshold. Here’s a concise overview based on historical data and verified reports: - Operation Olympic Games (2009–2010): Israel, in collaboration with the U.S., deployed the Stuxnet cyberweapon to sabotage Iran’s Natanz uranium enrichment facility. This malware damaged thousands of centrifuges, setting back Iran’s program by 1–2 years, as confirmed by the *New York Times* (2012) and Institute for Science and International Security. - Targeted Assassinations (2010–2012): Israel’s Mossad is widely believed to have assassinated key Iranian nuclear scientists, including Masoud Ali-Mohammadi (2010), Majid Shahriari (2010), and Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan (2012). These strikes disrupted Iran’s nuclear expertise, with estimates of a 1–3 year delay, per *The Guardian* (2012). - Operation Orchard (2007): Though primarily targeting a Syrian nuclear reactor, Israel’s airstrike (with suspected Iranian involvement) signaled its willingness to preempt nuclear threats, indirectly pressuring Iran’s program through regional deterrence, as noted by the *Washington Institute* (2008). - Sabotage and Covert Operations: Israel conducted multiple covert operations, including the 2018 sabotage at Natanz (likely via explosives), which damaged centrifuge production, and the 2018 theft of Iran’s nuclear archive from Tehran, exposing program details. The IAEA and *Reuters* (2018) estimate these actions delayed enrichment by 6–12 months. - Economic and Diplomatic Pressure: Israel lobbied for international sanctions, notably influencing the 2010 and 2012 UN resolutions, which restricted Iran’s nuclear material access, complementing military efforts, per *Foreign Affairs* (2013). These actions, spanning cyberattacks, assassinations, and sabotage, have collectively delayed Iran’s nuclear progress by several years, supporting Shapiro’s claim that Israel’s interventions have prevented Iran from crossing the nuclear threshold, despite Netanyahu’s repeated warnings since 2012. The effectiveness varies, with experts like the Arms Control Association noting gaps remain, but Israel’s strategy has been proactive.

--

Tehran, as a single city, has almost the same population as the entirety of Israel, about 10 million.

--

There is a very interesting conversation on X hosted by Canadian politician of Iranian descent, Goldie Ghamari, with people on the ground in that country.

This gives me hope that the Persians may overthrow the Jihadis.

You should check her out.


--

What we are looking at in Iran is less a fight between Iran and Israel / US as it is a fight between Jihadis and Persians.

--

Is Zionism an actual ideology?

All it means is that you believe in Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people.

How is that an ideology?

Are the Portuguese holding to some nefarious nationalist ideology because they believe that Portugal is, and should be, the nation-state of the Portuguese?

Are the Kazakhstanis holding to some nefarious nationalist ideology because they believe Kazakhstan is, and should be, the nation-state of the Kazakhstanis?

Yet Jihadis and their progressive-left allies insist that Israel... of all the countries in the world... is fundamentally and ideologically unacceptable.

They think of it in neo-socialist terms, which they do not do with any other country.

That is, they think of Zionism as a racist, white-European, colonial ideology hell-bent on oppressing the innocent, bunny-like "Palestinian" people-of-color.

In other words, they've conjured a hateful ideology and then project it onto the Jews.

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

The overthrow of the ayatollahs

could mean the failure of political Islam (Jihadism) which could lead to the normalization of Israel via the Abraham Accords and, thus, to greater prosperity in the region. After that we just need the racist left to stop hating Israel.

--

I was permanently banned from Facebook last week, June 11, for violating "Community Standards on account integrity."

The only thing that makes sense to me is that the people who watch over the site didn't like me telling antizionists, in a whole variety of ways, that they could go fuck themselves.

--

Oh, and btw, please say hello to Mervin, my tarzier spirit-guide!

--

We live in such a strange world.

This is an actual tweet on X today by the office of the Ayatolla Khamenei.

"the terrorist Zionist regime"

Plenty of his allies on the western-left use that exact type of terminology.

It shows the influence and crossover in the Progressive-Jihadi alliance.

--

Rumor has it that Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, is threatening to resign if the US joins Israel in an attack on Iranian nukes.

--

Grok3 tells us:

According to a Reagan Institute poll conducted from May 22 to June 2, 2025, 84% of Americans support preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, viewing it as crucial to U.S. security.

Thursday, February 27, 2025

Unless, of course, you think that "Zionists" are evil


One of the truths that almost no one ever discusses is that the Arabs we call “Palestinian” threw away a golden opportunity with the arrival of Israel in ’48.

It was right there at their feet, and they pissed all over it.

If they had simply made nice with the Jews, they could have built great lives for themselves and their children.

Arab citizens of Israel have greater freedom and economic opportunity than do regular Arabs throughout the entire rest of the Arab and Muslim Middle East.

The infant mortality rate among Israeli Arabs is 5.1 deaths per 1,000 live births. 

In Yemen it’s 44.6 deaths per 1,000 live births and in Iraq 18.7.

The “Palestinians,” and the Arab world, more generally, had a beautiful opportunity and trashed it out of theocratic hatred towards Jews.

Meanwhile, the western-left despises “Zionists” because they view the Jihad – and thus the beheading of Jews and the strangulation of Jewish babies -- as justified resistance to racist, white, western colonialism. 

I tell ya, man, it doesn’t get more fucked up than this.

People think that Nazi ideology was twisted, but it had nothing on this shit.

Oh, and btw, the image above?

It has nothing to do with anything beyond the fact that I conjured it and it represents my feelings toward most everything at this point.

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Return to Ziyon

The Golden Age of Blogdom

Well, I haven’t been around these parts in awhile.

A few of you guys may recall my name, I suppose... maybe.

I wrote something like 170 opinion pieces for the Elder between 2014 and 2020. 170. I can’t even believe it, myself.

I got dragged into the legal process because of one of them.

I started the H-Net group "H-1960s" when I was graduate student at Penn State University. I participated on Daily Kos and Maryscott O’Connor’s defunct My Left Wing as “Karmafish,” as well as my own little joint, Israel Thrives. 

Those blogs were not so different from this one, actually.

They came up around the same time, just as the political blogs were coming into vogue, and all got overshadowed by the big social media sites.

It was the Golden Age of Blogdom before the Giant-Corporate-Evil-Mega-Blogs like Facebook and Twitter / X and TikTok and Fuq-Dash sucked the heart and soul out of the baby… while strangling it in its crib!

It represented the transitionary period between the widespread introduction of the internet to the mainstream, in the early-mid 1990s, until domination by the big social media sites.

But what to make of that initial period of the small, transitional political blogs in the history of social media has yet to be written, as far as I know, but for me it basically lasted from about 2004 until I joined Facebook, maybe 5 years ago.

I knew joining Zuckerberg’s thing was probably a bad idea, but naturally I did it anyway. 

I liked the early blogs, prior to the rise of the Techno-Spider-Borg, because there was a level of intimacy, community, and discussion that you almost never see on the giant platforms.

There was also a strong sense that one no longer needed to be a member of the mainstream media to have a say in the public discussion. The possibilities seemed wide-open and to my eyes, at the time, like a step forward in the history of the western progressive-left. 


The Rise of Progressive-Left Antisemitic Anti-Zionism

But, sadly, the main thing that I got from the leftwing blogs, on places like Daily Kos, was an introduction to progressive-left grassroots/netroots antisemitic anti-Zionism. That is to say, I became intimate with the primary form of contemporary Jew Hatred which, today, just ooozes out of the Democratic Party and its progressive-left base.

This had a distinct influence on my thinking.

I was a very leftwing guy, a graduate of San Francisco State University, and a member of the Green Party in the early 00s.

Since then a number of former friends have wondered aloud, "What the hell happened to Lumish?"

The answer is that I became aware of the toxic anti-Zionism masquerading as "social justice" at the heart of the Democratic Party which seemed to grow in inverse proportion to the erosion of its core liberal values.

The liberal values eroding before our very eyes in the Democratic party are obvious. 

They include urinating all over the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Civil Rights Movement by honoring biological race over individual character.

They include a disregard for the essential ideal of freedom of speech as Antifa and BLM brownshirts threatened violence toward Milo Yiannapolis and Ben Shapiro at UCAL Berkeley.

Correlation does not imply causation, but it doesn't suggest mere happenstance either.

As progressive-left and Democratic Party antisemitic anti-Zionism seemed to grow, so the core liberal values seemed to erode.

Daily Kos under Markos Moulitsas, back in the day -- prior to the rise of woke-cultural Marxism in the United States -- was an up-and-comer in Democratic Party politics. We squabbled among ourselves, but many of us supported candidates like Howard Dean and Ralph Nader and Hillary Clinton. Almost all of us supported the street activists years before the rise of Black Lives Matter and Antifa. Many of us championed the ridiculous idea that defunding the police would make lives better for the urban poor.

We helped lay the semi-psychotic groundwork for the violent and ignorant frenzy that swept the country following the suicide of George Floyd on a Minneapolis street in the Spring of 2020.

Daily Kos represented the base of the party and was, to use the cliché, like a mansion with many rooms. The signs on the various doors as you walked down the hallway read “Feminism” or “Environmentalism” or “Racial Justice” or “Economic Justice” or “Anti-Colonialism” or “Veganism” and on and on and on.

But there was one door down the hall and around the corner that had a rather unpleasant smell coming out of it. This door, hanging from its hinges, with rats scurrying to-and-fro and cockroaches climbing on the walls, was a problem for Markos and it was a room he almost never entered.

The sign on that door read “Israel-Palestine.”

It was there that I really came to learn the nature of contemporary-left antisemitic anti-Zionism. I was working on my dissertation at the time and had never come across this level of anti-Zionist fervor before.

Certainly, nobody in the real world ever said to me, “Heya, Mike, you’re a Jew, right? A Zionist, maybe? Well, Jeez, don’t you know that Zionism is a white, racist, colonialist, imperialist, oppressive system of oppression on land brutally stolen from the indigenous Palestinians by Euro-Jews? Huh? Dontcha know that?”

Jeez, if only I had known that’s what we are.


The Question of Indigeneity

So, it was through my experience with social media that I came to learn the extent of antisemitic anti-Zionism crawling the hallways and houses of the progressive-left and the Democratic Party.

Anyway, I’ve been on sabbatical, so to speak, for the last year and dropped off social media almost entirely. There are a number of trends in the current conversation around the Long Arab / Muslim War that I hope to discuss in these pages going forward. 

The first of these is the question of indigeneity.

The hatred directed at Israel from left-leaning social media, as you guys are well-aware, is grounded in the idea that the Jews are interlopers on the land of the “indigenous Palestinian” population.

This false and toxic notion lurks behind virtually every contemporary anti-Zionist argument despite the fact that it is an obvious ahistorical fantasy. We need, remarkably enough, to always remind people that in the history of humanity there has never been a “Palestinian” nation. We need, remarkably enough, to always remind people that in the history of humanity there has never been a “Palestinian” state.

We need to remind them that the very words “Palestine” and “Palestinian” are Euro-Roman colonizer terms that refer to an Aegean seafaring people, the Philistines. We need to remind them that the very word “Palestine” was not created by Arabs nor did it refer to Arabs and, until after the ’67 War, it was not even accepted by the local Arabs to refer to themselves.

However, if we are to now accept that there is a newly-created “Palestinian” nation -- as conjured by Arafat and the Soviet Union in the early-mid 1960s – just how does this “Palestinian” nation or ethnicity or people differ from the rest of the Arab world?

If they share the same religion, language, and culture of all the other Arabs in the neighborhood, what is it that makes them a distinct ethnicity?

The answer is that they represent the spear-point in the Long Arab / Muslim War against the Jews of the Middle East.

And that is also why no one will allow the Gazans to flee the war. They are needed where they are. Their entire reason to be, from the Nazi-like perspective of the Palestinian-Arab national movement, is to be flung at the Jews.

They are there so that their “friends” in the Arab world, and throughout the western-left, can lap their blood while pointing the trembling finger of blame at the cruel "Zionists."

1,200 of our brothers and sisters were slaughtered on Oct 7 and 250 taken captive. On that day I noted in my journal that the western-left was going to blame Israel -- i.e., the Jews -- for that attack upon our people.

What I did not understand was the intensity with which they would do so.

This is a very scary moment.

I have zero intention of making aliyah, but every intention of looking into it.

As Twain famously is said to have said, history doesn't repeat itself... but it sure as hell rhymes.