Mike L.
I'll make it very simple for you: The problem with Iran is Iran. It refuses to accept the presence of a Jewish state in our ancestral homeland. It has nothing to do with who lives on what side of the Green Line.
For liberal Zionists such as myself, the primary concern in the maintenance of Israel as a Jewish and Democratic state. That right-wingers such as yourself fail to understand this is your problem, not mine. As for me, I much prefer a Jewish state without the West Bank to a Palestinian state with Tel Aviv.
I very much want to thank Reuven for making "it" simple for me.
I always very much appreciate it when people are so inclined. That being the case, let us take this simple bit by simple bit.
The problem with Iran is Iran. It refuses to accept the presence of a Jewish state in our ancestral homeland. It has nothing to do with who lives on what side of the Green Line.
I find myself in agreement that the problem with Iran is, in fact, Iran.
I also agree that Iran refuses to accept the presence of a Jewish state in our ancestral homeland and that it has nothing whatsoever to do with who lives on what side of the green line.
That being the case I have to assume that Reuven does not mind if Jewish people move into and live in and build housing for themselves in that part of the world, a part of the world that has been known as Judea and Samaria for millenia.
So far, we seem to be entirely in agreement.
For liberal Zionists such as myself, the primary concern in the maintenance of Israel as a Jewish and Democratic state.
I agree with this, as well.
Israel is a Jewish and democratic state (although not a Democratic one) and will continue to be so on into the future. I agree with Reuven 100 percent.
That right-wingers such as yourself fail to understand this is your problem, not mine.
It is unusual that since we agree entirely that Reuven suggests that we disagree. Just where is our disagreement, I wonder? What makes him "left-wing" and what makes me "right-wing" on this issue? And, more importantly, what makes one good and the other bad?
As for me, I much prefer a Jewish state without the West Bank to a Palestinian state with Tel Aviv.
What I would say is that I much prefer a Jewish state without the West Bank to a Palestinian state with Tel Aviv.
And, yet, somehow, Reuven considers himself a liberal Jew, of the progressive persuasion, yet he considers me a right-wing knuckle-dragger.
We agree entirely, yet he considers me the enemy.
How odd... and how sad, really.
.
.
.
*The image is the one that I used on my last diary at Daily Kos entitled
Breaking: Jew Builds Second Bathroom in East Jerusalem
I wanted to use some image and could not think of anything so I landed on this.
I think that Reuven is a decent guy, and a smart guy, and I am sad that he has such a low opinion of myself.
The truth is, whether he likes it or not, we're brothers.