Sunday, December 6, 2015

The Genocidal 72 Percent

Michael L.

{Also published at the Elder of ZiyonThe Jewish Press, Jews Down Under and The Algemeiner.}

stab This is the contemporary Ku Klux Klan.

As with the Klan they feel it necessary to wear masks.

They are worse than Night Riders because they feel free to carry out their violence in the daytime because they know they have Arab-Palestinian society, as created by Yassir Arafat and the PLO, behind them... as well as the Western-Left.

A recent Watan Research Center poll, conducted between November 14 and the 21st of this year, reveals that 72 percent of Arabs living in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza favor the Stabbing Intifada.

This is to say that 72 percent of Arabs who live within the Land of Israel believe that they have a religious-political imperative to send their kids into the streets with kitchen knives for the Allah-inspired purpose of murdering random Jews.

It does not matter the age of those Jews; a woman in her 80s, a child in her crib, it does not matter.  Nor does it matter the personal beliefs of those Jews.  All that matters is that, if you are to kill them - and you are, young Achmud - that they be Jewish.  Even Palestinian-Arab Jihadis do not necessarily have a particular desire to murder Tibetan-Buddhist care-takers , after all.

{But, who knows, really?}

Still another way of gaining perspective on this 72% figure is to understand that it also means that 72% of Arabs within Israel yearn for the genocide of the Jews.  It can mean nothing else.  If you believe that Allah wants you to send your children into the streets for the purpose of killing Jews then, ipso facto, you favor the genocide of the Jews.

There is no way to escape from that conclusion, now, is there?

Referencing a recent poll of Arabs within Israel, Dalit Halevy, writing in Israel National News, tells us:
A full 72% said they support continuing the "Al-Quds (Jerusalem) Intifada," as it has been termed, until it achieves its "goals," which they were later asked to define.

No less than 44% of the Arab public expressed support for an armed intifada terror war using guns, 18% gave support to stabbing attacks, and 14% supported attacks throwing rocks at Israelis.

The goal of the intifada terror war according to 48% of the Arabs is the "liberation of Palestine," indicating the conquest and occupation of all of Israel.
This is not a border dispute.

The War of the Filthy-Footed

This is a theocratic war waged by a much larger, hostile Arab-Muslim majority in the Middle East against a much smaller besieged filthy-footed Jewish minority endeavoring to survive and thrive.

The only reason that tiny bit of land on the edge of the Mediterranean is important to the Arab world is because Jewish people currently hold sovereignty over our ancestral homeland.  Unfortunately, it is hard-coded into Islam that Muslims have a theological imperative to maintain sovereignty over any bit of land - including Spain - that at any time was taken from the "infidels" by Muhammad's soldiers.

Thus Jewish sovereignty on Jewish land is considered an abomination before the eyes of Allah and an indignity to the Prophet Muhammad... Peace Be Unto Him.

You can be sure, considering Israel's technological and medical contributions to the world community, that if Israel represented a 23rd Arab-Muslim country it would be considered a "light unto the nations."

When Israel was under Ottoman rule, Jerusalem was a backwater.  The al-Aqsa mosque had no gold plating.  The place was essentially a ruin and nobody spoke of it as the third holiest anything to anyone.  The Jews, being indigenous to the region, have lived on that land for something close to four thousand years.

The Jewish people are the closest thing that the Land of Israel has to an indigenous population.  It is true that other peoples have lived on that land prior to the Israelites, but unless there is a wondering band of Jebusites out there someplace then the land from the river to the sea is the land of Jewish sovereignty.

The West

Vic Rosenthal, of Abu Yehuda fame and a columnist at the Elder of Ziyon, has a bold and interesting article entitled, Calling their bluffs.

His argument is that the enemy is attacking the Jews in Israel via a dual strategy of "micro" attacks and "macro" attacks.  The micro attacks represent things like the cute blonde child, who the Elder has dubbed "Shirley Temper" - part of the vaguely annoying Tamimi clan - that they send out to shake her little fist at Jewish soldiers.  

Here is a video from 2012:

As you can see, the Arabic press is there to broadcast any Israeli Jewish push-back as aggression.

The purpose is to induce an IDF response which can then be transmitted around the world via a sympathetic news media in Europe and the United States.  The little girl is not brave because she knows she has nothing to fear.

The purpose of demonizing Israel is to soften it for its eventual dissolution.

If that were to happen the genocide of half the world's Jewish population - amazingly enough about 6 million people (there is that number again) - would die in Holocaust Version II, the Arab-Muslim variety that the Mufti hoped to accomplish with the victory of Nazi Germany over the Allies during World War II.

The macro strategy is to attack Israel in a military fashion with rocket-fire from Gaza in order to intimidate the southern Israeli population, particularly the towns of S'derot and Ashkelon, and then appeal to the world community for mercy from Israeli aggression when the Jews - after years of such attacks - finally respond.

It is pathetic, but effective, given western multiculturalism and failure of self-esteem.


  1. "It is pathetic, but effective, given western multiculturalism and failure of self-esteem."

    Yes, certainly. We in the West fund the harassment and murder of the Jews in Israel and the endangerment of Jews worldwide. It's really past time to blow the cover off this racket.

  2. That's an interesting point.

    Perhaps I am mistaken, but traditionally the Land of Israel is comprised of Judea and Samaria.

    But, you're right. It's ambiguous.

    In any case, cloudy and rainy here in Oaktown this morning.

    And for some reason I cannot seem to get Nickelback out of my head.

    In any case, do you guys get the sense that things are building toward a crescendo?

    Europe, in particular, worries me, because now we have no idea what things will look like there in ten years.

    Again - Angela Merkel - giant butterfly net - nice pastoral setting - let her gaze at clouds.

    I do not remember the last time that I was this angry at an allied leader.

  3. In the midst of the unbelievably disgraceful state of politics on the British Left, here are two people getting it absolutely right.
    The first article describes events which are ( almost) unbelievable.

    The Shame and the Disgrace of the Pro-Islamist Left.

    Brilliant article by the ever excellent Jamie Palmer:

    And a terrific piece by James Bloodworth:

    To save itself after Paris, Europe must first rediscover itself.

  4. Oh, and the leader of the Labour Party:

    Jeremy Corbyn praised "magnificent" pro-Hamas rally.

    I believe there's video.


      try that link

    2. Thanks, Doodad, again!
      I do apologise for being careless.
      Your putting it right is very much appreciated. Really. :)

    3. My pleasure k. And thanks for all your wonderful contributions here.

  5. They always have. Nothing new here.

  6. "
    "CA attacker 'hated Israel'

    Father of Syed Rizwan Farook tells Italian media he tried to convince his son to stay away from terrorism: 'Be patient; Israel won't exist in another two years.'

    Syed Rizwan Farook, a 28 year old who participated in a shooting attack in California that killed 14 last week, hated Israel and was active in his opposition to the Jewish state, his father Rahil told Italy's La Stampa on Sunday.

    Farook's father added that he had tried to convince his son not to be drawn in by terrorism, telling him that Israel wouldn't exist anyway within two years.

    In his interview to La Stampa, Rahil described his son as "polite" and a "good man" but admitted that his political views were very conservative, especially with regards to Israel.

    According to the father, Farook expressed sympathy for the ideals of Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and the desire to create an Islamic state that would stand in opposition to Israel.

    "I always told him, 'remain calm, be patient; Israel won't exist in another two years,'" said the father. "The geopolitical situation is changing; Russia, China, even the US - no one wants the Jews there anymore. They'll send them back to Ukraine."

    Farook and his wife, Pakistani national Tashfeen Malik, committed the mass shooting together in the southern California community of San Bernardino, firing some 75 bullets at their victims.",7340,L-4735735,00.html

    The Islam plot thickens.

    1. Why would a child of immigrants born in America have such a burning hatred for a country had had never been to, and neither he nor his family have anything to do with?

    2. Doodad's got it.

      His religious ideology motivated him.

      We are used, in the West, to assigning socio-economic reasons to the violence associated with political Islam.

      For decades this has been promoted by western academics, activists, politicians, media people, and your average dumb schmuck on the street.

      The only problem, as should be clear by now, is that such notions are false.

      What drives the violence of political Islam is religious ideology and prejudice.

      It is the Quran.

      Israel, after all, treats its Arabs far better than Palestinian-Arabs are treated anywhere else in the larger Arab world.

    3. Given all we are learning, it's the only thing that makes sense. And the target was probably the Christmas party itself. Jihadist propaganda has long suggested Christmas attacks. The shooters rented the black SUV just days before the attack and are reputed to have wired their house to blow up when authorities arrived to search it but it failed because they used the wrong components.

      Also in this case, ideology trumped parenthood dinnit? Just like in Palestine and elsewhere in the terrorist world. Surprised they didn't take along their baby wrapped in a suicide belt to be honest.

    4. Yacoub,
      I understand that you're angry. And it's entirely reasonable to be opposed to appalling ideologies like Islamism. We all should be.
      However, it is entirely unreasonable to call anyone "scum" just because they were born in a particular country or have a particular faith.

  7. He hated Jews so much that he ran up on an Xmas party and mass murdered a random assemblage of people. Well THERE's a reason to chew on.

  8. This is brilliant. Orientals think Jews are smart. We can tell them that's why we use their blood in matzo preparation.

  9. Wow. The Donald has 'em going crazy now with his remarks about not allowing Muslims into the US until Congress figures stuff out. Ruin his chances or raise his chances? Inquiring minds wanna know.

    1. Trump is a problem because he is wealthy enough not really to care what others think of him, which is why he constantly puts his foot in his mouth.

      I suppose that he could be a decent president. He would certainly shake things up, stand tall for the US, and be a much better friend to Israel than the current denizen of the White House.

      Of course, if he were to speak to Vladimir Putin the way that he speaks to his Republican rivals he could easily get decked in the Oval Office.

      But I also think - because of that enormous yapper of his - that he's blowing his chances, despite his front-runner status.

      I see no one in the Republican field who can likely stand against Hillary.

      Ben Carson is too boring for words.

      If I am not mistaken, Ted Belman of Israpundit, has come out for Cruz, but I don't think he has a shot either.

      I like Rubio, but he's green. I think that he'll have a better shot in 2020 or even 2024.

      So, it looks like the Republicans may be stuck with Trump.

      My bet is that Hillary will clobber Trump... but it will definitely make for an entertaining race.

    2. No Rubio please. He likes H1b program too much.

  10. Doodad's words of wisdom: Don't blame the other; even if he is trying to kill you in Israel, Paris, London and San Bernardino. It'll only piss them off more.

  11. Trump seems to be doing the Democrats work for them. I'm sure he's too self-involved to see that, but he's doing more to ensure Hillary Clinton gets into the White House than she is.
    The conversation today should have been about Obama, but Trump even manages to take over the narrative when it's in the interest of "his side" to keep focus on Obama. That's probably because Trump has "no side" he's entirely interesting in himself. He couldn't care less if he destroys the GOP as a party and as a brand.
    When Hillary wins, she'll be in the White House for two terms.
    That's a fairly difficult prospect.

    1. K,
      Parties here tend to hold the White for two to three terms.
      1952 Republican
      1956 Republican
      1960 Democrat
      1964 Democrat
      1968 Republican
      1972 Republican
      1976 Democrat
      1980 Republican
      1984 Republican
      1988 Republican
      1992 Dem
      1996 Dem
      2000 Rep
      2004 Rep
      2008 Dem
      2012 Dem

      As you can see the only time the same party won three straight terms since 1952 was the 1980's. The only time a party held the White House for only 1 term is was the ill-fated administration of Jimma Cottah, whose brain cancer was cured do to the existence of a country which he is fond of maligning.