My blog sometimes plunges into the open sewers of the Australian racist antizionist left to confront the ignorant and gutless head on. Man to man so to speak.
Or in the case of the low rent crowd who constitute New Matilda, man to sissy.
It's filthy work but really some one needs to do it. Otherwise some could get the idea that this crazy jarring antisemitic narrative has gone unnoticed and unchallenged.
The leading site of the genre is probably New Matilda where this blog has been dropping comments for years. You can see for yourself how much they hate me. Naturally I wear this as a badge of honour.
Take a look at this.
NEWS
27 Jun 2015
We Lost Another Reader, But At Least He
Threatened To Sue Us First
There’s a well-worn theory in the media that if both sides of a debate hate you, then you’re probably doing something right.
Last month, we banned reader ‘Kevin Charles Herbert’ from our site after he posted comments on a story which promoted Holocaust denial (NM has very strict rules on this… you can read them here).
Mr Herbert subsequently threatened to sue us for defamation… and you can read that romping tale, including the correspondence, here.
But that was way back in ‘May’. Now it’s ‘June’. And what month in independent media would be complete without another legal threat from another angry reader.
Introducing ‘Geofffff’, also known as ...., a regular and enthusiastic New Matilda commenter. Or at least he was.
‘Geoffff’ is well known on our site for taking on Holocaust deniers. That’s the part about him we like. In particular, he was an occasional sword crosser with Mr Herbert, and was particularly pleased when Mr Herbert’s account was deleted.
Which is why this next bit is so ridiculously ironic.
Last week, Geoffff accomplished the same feat after posting an abusive comment at the bottom of a Michael Brull article, in which he called our beloved columnist an “ignorant creep”, a “dickhead” and a “brain dead coward” (and yes, more irony, it was a Brull piece which provoked the response from Kevin Charles Herbert as well).
Yep. That's a pretty transparent parody of the front page of our dear and much loved blog. The rude bastards.
Do read it all. I'm having fun.
 |
| Head Wanker |
.
They deleted my account which means that every comment that I have ever made has also been deleted. Expunged from the pages of history, as it were, exactly what they keep on saying they want to do to Israel and the Jews.
Ordinarily I would be annoyed by such rudeness and contempt for other people's property but this is New Matilda, we should not forget.
Who cares if they delete your comments from the start.? All they are doing is proving your point. Besides their readership is tiny and slipping. You can see how much advertising they attract. They depend on donations and subscriptions, probably stoked up by the Greens party, Australia's first populist fascist party since the New Guard of the thirties.
I'm not going to waste too much breath on this but it will come as no surprise that everything Graham says is a lie. I did not edit a comment after it had been deleted. I did not threaten this sad little man with litigation after I was defamed and I certainly did not applaud the taking down of another commenter's account after this wanker accused him of being a Holocaust denier. (As if Graham would know one when he saw one. A startling feature of the modern left is how profoundly ignorant they are).
I do not regard calling out the racism of the left for what it is, abuse. This thing is far too serious for abuse. They call that abuse? That 's not abuse.
I've been called a Nazi, a Zionazi (numerous times) racist, again and again, and other things too choice to mention in Graham's discussion boards without any demur from Graham (or for that matter me).
That's abuse.
That's the language of this debate. This is after all a cold war.
That's one thing. Nasty, malice driven defamation is something else.
I've been called a Nazi, a Zionazi (numerous times) racist, again and again, and other things too choice to mention in Graham's discussion boards without any demur from Graham (or for that matter me).
That's abuse.
That's the language of this debate. This is after all a cold war.
That's one thing. Nasty, malice driven defamation is something else.
Like a sez you howling kid, Graham accuses me of defaming his resident antisemitic Jew.
This is because he know nothing at all about antisemitism and the law of defamation. Nor do any of his comrades, it goes without saying. How could they be expected to? They are of the left and sucked in antisemitism with their mothers' milk.
This is because he know nothing at all about antisemitism and the law of defamation. Nor do any of his comrades, it goes without saying. How could they be expected to? They are of the left and sucked in antisemitism with their mothers' milk.
This is from the resident self hater complete with applause from the stoker in charge.
Michael Brull is the guy who once wrote that those who seek to defend the human rights of women in Muslim lands, and who condemned the abuse of women and girls; everything from mutilation, beatings, executions, slavery and honour murders in an enforced second class somewhere between livestock and human beings, are guilty of "cultural imperialism" .
That one even made Elder of Zion.
That one even made Elder of Zion.
13 Jun 2015
Michael Brull's Media Recommendations For
Everything You Need To Know About The
Middle East
A lot of Australians don’t know much about the Middle East and don’t know how to learn more. I think there’s something to be said for deeper reading on the subject, to make sense of what’s happening today. But there are also media outlets and analysts worth reading, which offer news and insight, and below I review some I’d recommend to readers.
As a general source on the Middle East, I have long been a fan of the UK’s Independent. I think its reporters show an unusual level of independence and intelligence. It’s home to Robert Fisk, who won international acclaim for his reporting on the Middle East, particularly his work on the Lebanon Civil War, Pity the Nation. Sadly, Fisk seems to have declined as a reporter in recent years.
However, the Independent does have another singularly brilliant journalist on the Middle East: Patrick Cockburn. Cockburn has been reporting on Iraq with distinction since before the invasion began in 2003, and has also done excellent – in my view, the best – reporting on Syria since the uprising broke out there.
Rather than reciting the propaganda interests of this side or that, Cockburn consistently offers his own shrewd and insightful analysis. He began writing a book on the rise of ISIS before the West noticed its victories, and wound up publishing the first study on them in August 2014. For those who want to understand the rise of ISIS, it is essential reading.
For more general news reporting on the Middle East, Al Monitor has reporters from a range of countries and backgrounds. The reporting quality can vary, but is a good resource, and has had some outstanding reporting and analysis.
For commentary and analysis on the Middle East for lay readers, Informed Comment is a great resource. Run by Middle East academic specialist Juan Cole, it often features guest commentary. It’s designed to be accessible to American readers who are not assumed to have a lot of background knowledge. Cole is a very intelligent and well informed analyst, with wide-ranging knowledge. He also speaks several languages, including Arabic and Persian. Politically, he is not a radical – he identifies as a liberal Democrat.
"Everything you need to know".
Can you believe this?
Literally thousands of books, histories, academic studies, personal eye witness accounts and enough analysis to sink the Arc but as far as Graham and Brull are concerned, the fraction of one percent of this output put out by antizionist "scholars" with a well trodden market is "everything you need to know".
Everything.
Nothing defines the antisemitic Stalinist left better that one phrase.
Let's hear it again. Let it ring.
Everything you need to know. Brought to you by the Australian left.
Did I mention they are a pack of wankers?
I'm pleased to report they don't like that. Do go here if you want to tell them something .Then consider posting what you said here.
You can be certain it will not be deleted.
Cross posted Geoffff's Joint
What's up with the formatting?
ReplyDeleteWhy are those headlines messed up and can you please fix it, Geoff?
"Juan Cole" and "well-informed" are antonyms.
ReplyDelete