Sunday, November 1, 2015

The New York Times and the murder of a Jewish-American peace activist in Jerusalem

Michael L.

{Cross-posted at the Elder of ZiyonJews Down Under, and The Algemeiner.}

Richard Lakin
Murdered School Principal, Richard Lakin
Those of us who care about Israel, and those of us who know a thing or two about the New York Times, know that just as the Times was indifferent to the Shoah while it was happening, so they are generally indifferent to Arab attacks on Jewish people today.  The major indication of this indifference is the insistence on apologizing for Arab terrorism against Jews in that part of the world.

Those of us who closely follow the conflict from a pro-Jewish / pro-Israel perspective understand that the Times has an anti-Israel bias and thus sees Israel - or, really, Israeli Jews - as the primary culprits in this never-ending bloody drama.

It is as if they have learned nothing from their own institutional history.  Surely the Times must have an in-house historian who can point to the parallel between the "Gray Lady's" disinterest in the Holocaust and its white-washing of Arab persecution of the Jewish people today.

Most westerners, with considerable assistance from the Times, think of Jewish Israelis as the aggressors in a conflict against the "Palestinians" that began in 1948.

This is entirely false.

The conflict is not between Israelis and "Palestinians."  Nor is this a conflict with twentieth-century roots.

klansmenOn the contrary.  This is an ongoing war of the Arab-Muslim majority in the Middle East against the Jewish minority whom the Arabs outnumber by a factor of 60 or 70 to one in the region.  Furthermore, this never-ending Koranically-based Arab-Muslim war against the Jews has been an ongoing project since the good-old-days of Muhammad's head-chopping epiphany on the Arabian Peninsula.

Just the other day, Israeli-American educator and peace activist, Richard Lakin (76), died of multiple wounds incurred when young Arab Jihadis forced their way onto a Jerusalem bus and started shooting and knifing people to death. They were out to kill Jews because they were trained from childhood to despise Jewish people and when the Palestinian leadership started calling for slaughter - for a Stabbing Intifada - they went for it with gusto and continue to do so.  They were taught their entire lives by their religious leaders, by their political leaders, and presumably by their parents, that Jews are the enemy not only of Arabs but of Allah, himself.

Thus during this current frenzy of Arab violence and incitement to genocide, Richard Lakin gets shot in the head and knifed for no other reason than he happened to be Jewish on a bus in Jerusalem.

He also fought for the Civil Rights Movement in the United States and marched with Martin Luther King, Jr. in Washington D.C. on the day of the famous 1963 I Have a Dream speech.

To its credit, the New York Times did cover the story in a piece by Israel bureau chief Judi Rudoren entitled, For American-Israeli Teacher, Death Came on the No. 78 Bus.  My main quibble with Rudoren's rendition of the story is how blasé the piece is.  I considered doing an analysis of her writing on the matter, but the main criticism that I came up with is flatness of style and a failure to emphasize the murder within the larger context of Palestinian incitement to violence and genocide.

She's a bureau chief for the Times.  She cannot, generally speaking, afford to get angry within the pages of the paper.

I, sadly, do not have that problem.

Aside from the loss of Mr. Lakin there are many very sad things about this situation.

One sad thing, of course, is that it is happening at all.  Hatred for the Jew is embedded in Arab culture throughout the Middle East and justified by the Koran.  The foundation of the conflict has little to do with land and almost everything to do with many centuries of Arab-Muslim race-hate toward the Jewish people.  If Israel behaved exactly the same way since its birth, but it was another Muslim state, it would be lauded throughout the world as... a light unto the nations.

Another sad thing is the inability of Israel to really defend itself from internal Arab violence and aggression.  Young Arab men run around the country endeavoring to kill Jews and if the Jewish community, via the government of Israel, stands up to defend itself the international community comes down on it like a ton of bricks.

Both westerners and Arabs have been trained over many centuries to conceive of Jewish self-defense as an immoral form of aggression.  It is for this reason that Jihadi rocketeers in Gaza could shoot thousands of rockets into southern Israel, forcing parents to snatch children from their beds in the middle of the night to the cries of sirens and giving those same kids post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and outside of Israel nobody much minded.  It was only when Israel stood up after taking it on the chin for years that the international community leaped up and demanded that Israel cease its aggression against the "innocent, indigenous Palestinian community."

Finally, it is a sad but not surprising fact that the Obama administration does not care about this case.  Obama has not breathed a public word.  Lakin was an American.  He was an educator.  And he was a peace activist who stood up for the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s.  Israeli-Arabs shot him in the head and knifed him in the chest at the age of 76.

One would think that maybe the president of the United States, who comes out of the same ideological movement as did Lakin, might have something to say, if only an expression of regret.

Thus far, however, nothing.

21 comments:

  1. Obamatrons will eventually eat themselves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jewish Obamatrons are eating their hearts silently in dark corners... because on some level, even they know that they were terribly wrong.

      {Is that not right, Volleyboy1?}

      Delete
  2. Perhaps if he had made a shitty clock that looked like a bomb Obama would have acknowledged him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I cannot help but wonder that if Mr. Lakin was not a Jew, but an American "of color" with a similar background if he would have acknowledged the man.

      Delete
    2. He probably wouldn't if said person had been an Israeli citizen. I think it's true to say that the Civil Rights movement has become so anti-Zionist that it has sought to distance itself from the role Jews played in it.
      I haven't yet seen the film, but I think there was a controversy about " Selma" when a prominent Jewish character was essentially airbrushed out of the story. I believe his remaining relatives were upset and complained about it.
      It seems Martin Luther King"s famous views on anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism are out of fashion these days.

      Delete
    3. k,
      Everything you said is true.

      Mike,
      re: "of color"
      Only if that person were shot by a white cop, or a Jew.

      Delete
  3. It all reminds me of the original "War of the Worlds" when the townspeople go out to the meteor site with their white flag shouting they come in peace. And are immediately incinerated by the Martian heat ray.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At least in the movies they figure it out quickly. They don't spend their time attributing it to Martian grievances with the West. (Hey, wait a minute, I think I may have found next year's Best Picture Oscar!)

      Delete
    2. Jeff.
      Unsurprisingly, the "Guardian" has been worrying about similar matters:

      http://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scientist-2015/may/06/how-can-our-future-mars-colonies-be-free-of-sexism-and-racism

      Delete
    3. Once we staff NASA with enough clock boy geniuses, diversity on Mars will cease to be our problem.

      Delete
  4. This is great:

    Obama licenses Iran to ship missiles to Hezbollah

    And why wouldn't he?

    http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/194660/obama-licenses-iran-to-ship-missiles-to-hezbollah

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obama will have Jewish blood on his hands over this. What a fool.

      Delete
    2. He's not a fool, he's a Jew-hating, murderous psycho.

      Delete
    3. Randall. What? Just cause he gave nukes to the Iranians and missiles to Hezbollah and money to Jew killing knifers and car rammers, etc????? ; 0

      Delete
    4. Well, not just that. He also supported the Muslim Brotherhood overthrow of Egyptian secular dictator Hosni Mubarek. (Luckily a new secular dictator overthrew the MB fascists - over Obama's strenuous opposition.)

      Then he overthrew Libya's secular dictator Gaddafi and helped Islamic extremists take his place.

      Now he's attempting the same thing in Syria - arming and defending ISIS (while pretending to fight them) in their drive to overthrow another secular dictator.

      As I''ve written here before, he's an outright Jihadist. By now the burden of proof is on those who say otherwise.

      .

      Delete
  5. This is early as I write this, but I am exceedingly pleased to wake up to the sound of rain on the windows.

    We've been under a terrible drought and this is a relief.

    This particular little storm probably will not make much of a difference in terms of California's watersheds, but it's a good sign.

    Hopefully, more to come.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is fascinating polling information on what Palestinians really think and believe re Israel. Staggeringly depressing.

    Via Mosaic magazine.
    h/t Mick Hartley.

    http://mickhartley.typepad.com/blog/2015/11/the-palestinian-public.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. Apologies for so many posts but there are quite a lot of interesting things today.
    For anyone who is interested in more on the Gerald Kaufman story, and what else happened at that meeting, this blog today by David Collier is important.
    It says an awful lot about the state of the British left. None of it good. It's well worth a read. And includes some audio.

    http://david-collier.com/?p=1368

    ReplyDelete
  8. Have you seen this?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G7d-yDf_ms

    ReplyDelete