Israel Thrives: Clinton calls Libya killings a ‘terrorist attack’

Friday, September 21, 2012

Clinton calls Libya killings a ‘terrorist attack’

Mike L.

US secretary of state says America will not rest until those responsible are brought to justice, stresses ‘offensive’ film doesn’t justify violence

WASHINGTON (AP) — US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Friday said it was a “terrorist attack” that killed the American ambassador to Libya and three others.

She added that the US would not rest until those responsible are brought to justice.

My. My. My.

That is big news, isn't it?

Can you imagine? A high-level official of the Obama administration daring to call terrorism "terrorism"? That is some sort-of concession, I have to tell you. All it took was the slaughter of 4 American diplomats in Libya and the storming of the US embassy in Cairo for the Obama administration to utter the word "terrorist."

Who knows what may happen next?

They may even decide to recognize the obvious fact that political Islam is an actual political movement throughout the Middle East that is hostile to the United States, that is genocidal toward Jews, that represses women and summarily executes Gay people and whose leaders include the mullahs in Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that Barack Obama personally helped usher into power.

Again, wasn't this president of the United States also the president of the Harvard Law Review?

I think that it was Dennis Praeger who said something like, "That is an opinion so horrendously stupid that it could only be held by someone with an advanced education."

Now if they decide to actually prevent Iranian nukes, we'll have something. Until then I remain unimpressed.

3 comments:

DoodadSeptember 21, 2012 at 5:11 PM
“The greater the terror, the greater the self-flagellation of its victims.”

Melanie Philips
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Barack Obama on the so-called "Arab Spring" (May 19, 2011):

"There are times in the course of history when the actions of ordinary citizens spark movements for change because they speak to a longing for freedom that has been building up for years. In America, think of the defiance of those patriots in Boston who refused to pay taxes to a King, or the dignity of Rosa Parks as she sat courageously in her seat."

The "Arab Spring" was the brutal rise of political Islam in the Middle East and this is what Obama compares the Civil Rights Movement to?

How's that for a kick in the head to Martin Luther King, Jr.?

The Fundamental Argument:

The progressive movement, and the activist base of the Democratic Party, creates and supports venues that demonize and defame the Jewish state, thereby also creating hatred toward the Jewish people.

Such venues include political journals, such as, but not limited to, Daily Kos, the Huffington Post, and the UK Guardian, numerous universities throughout the United States and Europe, various NGOs with an anti-Israel agenda, and the entire progressive-left movement to boycott, divest from, and sanction (BDS) the Jewish people of the state of Israel.

These venues and organizations do not generally criticize Israel, but dehumanize that country.

For this reason, among others, the progressive movement, and the activist base of the Democratic Party, undermines the well-being and safety of Jews around the world, sometimes resulting in violence toward us.

Therefore, as a matter of common sense and basic human decency, Jews should leave the progressive movement and the Democratic Party as we seek to build alternative political structures that are not home to toxic anti-Semitic anti-Zionists, who would see us robbed of self-determination and self-defense.

What You Can't Discuss:

This is a partial list of taboo topics within progressive-left venues around the Arab-Israel conflict. You cannot discuss this material because it undermines the "Palestinian narrative" of perpetual victimhood. This narrative is a club used by the Arab and Muslim enemies of Israel, along with their western progressive allies, to delegitimize that country in preparation for its eventual dissolution.

1) The centuries of Jewish dhimmitude under the boot of Islamic imperialism.

2) The recent construction of Palestinian identity, its connection to Soviet Cold War politics, and how this is an Arab people with a Roman name that refers to Greeks.

3) Arab and Palestinian Koranically-based racism as the fundamental source of the conflict.

4) The ways in which contemporary progressive anti-Zionism serves as a cloak for gross anti-Semitism.

5) The Palestinian theft and appropriation of Jewish history.

6) "Pallywood."

7) The historical connections between the Nazis, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Palestinian national movement.

8) The perpetual refusal of the Palestinian-Arabs to accept a state for themselves in peace next to the Jewish one.

9) The progressive portrayal of terrorists as those fighting a righteous war of "resistance."

10) The Arab-Palestinian indoctrination of children with Jew hatred.

11) Human rights violations against women, children, and Gay people in the Muslim Middle East.

12) The fact that violent Jihadis call themselves "Jihadis" and claim to love death above life.

This is only a partial list, so please let us know the many more that we are missing.

Pages

Friday, September 21, 2012

Clinton calls Libya killings a ‘terrorist attack’

3 comments: